Heidegger

On 12/06/2006, at 4:09 AM, Anthony Crifasi wrote:
> Present a summary of the interlocutor’s position, and tell them
> that you are
> open to their adding, deleting, and editing it as they see fit
> until “we
> reach agreement,” without telling them that you are lying about that.

On 12/06/2006, at 3:05 AM, Bob Guevara wrote:
> as opposed to REAL reality eh?

On 12/06/2006, at 10:40 AM, That Pete wrote:
> I think you’re doing a great job demonstrating what I allude to.

If you three are completely incapable of contributing to this
discussion beyond your ill informed and obnoxious insults and troll
baiting I’d appreciate it if you could stop spamming me and leave
this space open for others. I’m interested in rational, well reasoned
responses to the historical interpretations I’ve posited, whether
that’s in the form of specific challenges to the historical
documentation I’ve provided from Einstein and Arendt through to the
US Republican Party’s Congressional response to Pearl Harbor, or any
of the philosophical possibilities these open up with respect to
Heidegger’s critique of power.

This is a university sponsored philosophical discussion list and your
constant recourse to ad hominem insults and logically challenged
reactionary populism while steadfastly refusing to rationally deal
with any of the tabled propositions is effectively an attempt at
shutting down open discussion and will no doubt be discouraging
others from contributing. I do not take any of your accusations or
insults lightly, they are in fact defamatory. If you have nothing
further to offer to this discussion thread then please cease and desist.

Regards,

Malcolm Riddoch

***************************
Dr Malcolm Riddoch
Electronic Arts
School of Communications and Contemporary Arts
Faculty of Communications and Creative Industries
Edith Cowan University, 2 Bradford St, Mount Lawley
Perth Western Australia
+61 08 9370 6034

Posted on Monday, June 12th, 2006 at 4:45 am
comment | rss 2.0 | trackback