Heidegger

In a message dated 04/08/2007 03:16:50 GMT Standard Time, tgeorgescu at home.nl
writes:

> Madsen, a Washington-based writer and columnist, who often writes for
> Counterpunch, says that people close to the pope claim that amid these
> concerns, the pontiff wishes he was younger and in better health to
> confront the possibility that Bush may represent the person prophesized
> in Revelations.

Sounds like a cock and bull story to me. The present Pope has sympathy for
neo-conservatism, so why should he attack his own ally?
Jud:

It’s simple. Because, being astute, the Pope can see that the incompetent
Zionist tool Bush has done more harm to neo-conservatism and the Christian
religion than all the King’s horses and all the King’s men put together
could every do - even if they worked assiduously in the Democratic Party Central
Office or The Devil’s Personal New York Bureau for the next 100 years.

Not only has the half-wit cowboy duh, duh dongo done more damage to America
that any other president in the whole history of the USA, he has slit the
wrists of decent conservatism and defaced old glory in the eyes of the whole
wide world and millions of his own countrymen.

When will the overwhelmingly large majority of decent, caring influential
Jews get rid of these gutter-crawling mediocre shysters from their midst?
Can’t they see that the unequal emphasis on Israeli eudaemonia and expansion at
the expense of the relief of the people of Palestine? Oil supplies apart, the
welfare of the badly-off, desperate and despised millions in the Arab world
is more important in the long term for them as American citizens, as well as
being the better move Real Politik-wise for the USA and its loyal
supporters?

regards,

Jud

Besides, as Martin
Luther (could have) said, the Pope has to look in the mirror, in order to
see the Antichrist. He is of course not the only Antichrist there is. In
general, the Antichrist is not one man, but this symbolic character may
represent the fallen leaders of the nations. So, Bush could be part of the
Antichrist, too, but he is certainly not the first and not the last in this
respect.

Greetings,

Tudor

Posted on Saturday, August 4th, 2007 at 4:15 pm
comment | rss 2.0 | trackback