QED
March 29th, 2008, search relatedRelated posts :: No related posts
In a message dated 29/03/2008 12:34:07 GMT Standard Time,
_crifasian at gmail.com_ (mailto:crifasian@gmail.com) writes: Bob Guevara wrote:
I’ve never seen anything quite like Polanik and I’ve been on the net since
the command line days … he’s not a troll per se. He’s not simply mis-guided
or dense or … it’s quite bizarre.
“… before some audiences not even the possession of the exactest knowledge
will make it easy for what we say to produce conviction. For argument based
on knowledge implies instruction, and there are people whom one cannot
instruct.” (Aristotle, Rhetoric 1355a25)
Jud:
Fine in principle, but if what is possessed is not of the exactest
knowledge of anything meaningful, but a load of ontologically juvenile and
Heideggerianian trollistic crap, then no amount of argument (couched in the
nursery-language of Heidegger) based upon such metaphysical meconium and
trailer-park La-La Land transcendentalism implies anything - at all - least of all
knowledge or [worse still) instruction.
It is obvious that Joe is running rings around skinhead Heideggerienism and
I am enjoying every moment of his gadfly style. The only pity is that the
old Nazi is not alive to answer Joe’s probing deconstructions of the
Jesuitically inspired codswallop personally (although his Nazi arm-band will look a
little mildewed by now and his lovingly polished party badge lost its shine)
rather than the attempted and rather pathetic attempt at vindication being in
the hands of sundry faith-driven thurifers, acolytes and provincial
theoretical gauleiters of his of the old fascist’s arrant nonsense.
On with the show Joe! Rub the evil Heidegger’s nose in the dirt he called
*the Boden* till it draws *the blut* he gloried in so much - that is -
his OWN blood this time - not the blood of the millions he called upon to be
exterminated. The only propositional denotation to which the QED relates
to here, is the proposition that Heidegger suffered from some form of
Asberger’s sydrome concerning *Being* in which he was mentally unable to tell his
ontological arse from his self professed theologistical elbow. In the words of
a rather frustrated Father Julius Furzarsch of the gymnasium at
Inconstance in 1903, who was responsible for the young runt’s transferral to Bertholds
gymnasium in Freiberg in 1906
*It is about time we moved this ontological prick to another parish.*
Jud.
