Symptoms as Evidence
May 25th, 2008, search relatedRelated posts :: Symptoms as Evidence :: Symptoms as Evidence :: Symptoms as Evidence :: Symptoms as Evidence
Anthony Crifasi wrote:
> Thank you for this response. You will receive a reply from me to it, as
> well as to other points you have recently raised, once you have
> completed your replies to every unique argument that I have already
> given, are here:
your word is no good, professor.
I replied to a batch of your inquiries; and, all you did in return was
click the reply button and say that you weren’t going to answer my
questions concerning any conflict between your position and Heidegger’s
position because, you claim, I misunderstand Heidegger so profoundly.
* * *
at this point, you need to clarify what precisely you are talking about.
as recent posts have indicated,
“I’m asking whether your argument negating, IPN, ‘it is Impossible to
attribute Predicates to Nothing(ness)’, is equivalent to proving PPN,
‘it is Possible to attribute Predicates to Nothing(ness)’.”
is that what you say you have achieved with an allegedly rational
argument whose major premise is derivable from ‘I do not exist’ and
whose minor premise guarantees that the major premise is either false or
vacuous?
until you at least tell us this, we might not have a clear idea of what
your argument is about, if anything.
Joe
–
Philosophy is, after all, done ultimately in the first person for the
first person. — H-N Castaneda
@^@~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~@^@
http://what-am-i.net
@^@~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~@^@
