Tales From the Billabong of *Being*[B]
September 6th, 2006, search relatedRelated posts :: Tales From the Billabong of *Being* :: Tales From the Billabong of *Being* :: Tales From the Billabong of *Being* :: Tales From the Billabong of *Being*
In a message dated 9/5/2006 5:54:02 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
GEVANS613 at aol.com writes:
as you know I do not believe that *apriori* which is a word which describes
*deductively reasoning from a general principle to a necessary effect; not
supported by fact* exists at all – in fact I do not believe that the human
description of anything in the cosmos exists either. I believe that only the humans
who describe such objects exist.
Jud; A world without word or beginning and only “humans” is a very lonely
world indeed. A world without fact before a fact without the apriori word
precludes the aposteriori. We have to start somewhere to get on with it so lets get
past the beginining about what exists or not and start talking about Heidegger
whether for or against him aside from his politics that are or aint. I am thus
not quite so sure that I should bring up questions that no one on this list
would care to discus but prefer to remain stuck debating your idle beginning
without future. So, enough with the noumenal bones and get on with the
phenomenal meat, i.e., phae, in the light of noumena and substance (that upon which IT
stands). Without the apriori Word (Logos) we remain stuck in the
philosophers’ heaven shoveling shit. So, at the risk of sending IT and IS back to dear old
Mum, mum’s the word and dear old Dad remains hung in the closet. Enough,
already with dumb mums (the Word) and a deaf ear.
Sincerely;
Bernard
(bxbovasso)
