Heidegger

In a message dated 3/31/2007 10:18:31 PM Eastern Daylight Time, GEVANS613 at aol.com writes:
a message dated 01/04/2007 02:04:48 GMT Standard Time, Bernx at aol.com writes:
In a message dated 3/31/2007 9:43:23 AM Eastern Daylight Time, GEVANS613 at aol.com writes:
present for your consideration the notion that the existential modalities of all entities are determined combinatorially and hierarchically by the totality of the antecedal catenulate modalities of an infinite material universe, and that its constituent persistent objects (vide: Hume’s billiard balls etc.) are merely sub-holonistic agents or proxies of change deterministically and concatenationally selected by the remote mechanisms of the material imperium…
Eh, What, Jud! Do you mean God and the six days of creation? What else is a “material imperium” but the domain of the Demiurgos. On the other hand it may be Big Fat Mum: matrix qua materia qua mater. The only question then remaining is whether there is a freedom of choice to favour one or the other in your petite creative eliminations.
Dear Bernard: I have made it abundantly clear throughout the piece, that any abstractions I [am forced] to employ, are purely semantic markers, which do NOT imply that any existential modality of any holon [system] actually exists - and only ‘that which is systematised’ is extant. It is also clear that my own neologisms – ‘The material imperative, the materiocracy, the materioarchy and the holarchy’ etc., are themselves abstractions. They are ’stand in’ or ‘ bookmark abstractions’ pending the day when alternative nouns, shorn of their classical and medieval payloads of meaningless meconium are introduced, which are accepted by the scientific and philosophical community as semantically sufficient labels suitable for the designata in question. Meanwhile I am forced to employ the dust-bath clunch language that guys like you roll around in, like baptised badgers or a born-again bipeds trying to rid themselves of metaphysical mites, flatulence and fleas.
Best wish and well-over the fast when it comes!

Sincerely
Jud
Let’s face it, Jud, beneath your cosmetic of sematic markers, *La bella figura* is no more than a store bought suit. In the buff, however, the real danger is not us fleas. We are but the messengers for your dreaded plague or what a more scatologically inclined Dr. Freud referred to as “The black mud of the occult,” reminding his sublatern at the time, C.G. Jung, that he was waxing too close to fleadom. So, no relief at hand: “The material imperative, the materiocracy, the materioarchy and the holarchy’ etc., are themselves abstractions.” Following in the drift of such mere abstractions I call it closer to home in my next book on the nature of matricentricity, aka, Mum’s imperative, or what rules the matricentristic male. Sincerely; Bernard

************************************** See what’s free at http://www.aol.com.

Posted on Sunday, April 1st, 2007 at 6:10 am
comment | rss 2.0 | trackback