The Denial System
May 18th, 2008, search relatedRelated posts :: PHYSICAL PAIN and PHYSICAL PLEASURE :: Rule of the imbecile :: Religion is “childish,” “primitive” :: THE SYSTEM OF NATURE.
Anthony Crifasi wrote:
>Joseph Polanik wrote:
>>Anthony Crifasi wrote:
>>>Thanks you for addressing my arguments. My replies to all of them are
>>>contained in this post.
>>>Please address every item in this post.
>>you seem to have trouble focusing on distinct issues and when you
>>combine your responses you just sail past crucial points in a cloud of
>>verbiage; so, I’m certainly not going to address every item in the
>>same post; and, if some tangential point is overlooked, so be it.
>There were many items that were repeats of and references to other
>items in the same reply, so obviously you don’t have to address those
>more than once. As soon as you address every unique argument, I will
>send my reply.
not so fast, Professor.
1: I do not waltz to the shuffling sound of Crifasi doublespeak.
if you apply these expectations to yourself; then, you aren’t finished
writing the so-called ‘reply’ you started 2008-05-08
http://an-archos.com/pipermail/heidegger…)
because you haven’t yet addressed the *issues* raised in
http://an-archos.com/pipermail/heidegger…
(and in *many* earlier posts where I asked you to explain how your
position is consistent with the passage from Heidegger I quoted in that
post).
all you did was hit the reply button on your emailer and paste in an
allegation that I didn’t reply to some extraneous post of yours. well,
I’ve replied. now, you’re up at the plate. take a swing — explain how
you make your position consistent with Heidegger.
you’re still up at the plate. take a swing at it — at actually
addressing the issue.
2: Time out for Remedial Logic 101
here’s you 2008-04-21
http://www.an-archos.com/pipermail/heide…):
“How many times have I had to point out to you that a modus tollens
hypothetically presupposes what will be contradicted in the end?”
well, you’ve pointed it out so many times that I’m beginning to suspect
that you actually believe this.
obviously, you’ve gotten modus tollens confused with reductio ad
absurdum.
look for the post entitled, “Remedial Logic 101: Modus Tollens vs
Reductio Ad Absurdum”
Joe
–
Philosophy is, after all, done ultimately in the first person for the
first person. — H-N Castaneda
@^@~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~@^@
http://what-am-i.net
@^@~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~@^@
