The Experientio
February 24th, 2008, search relatedRelated posts :: Experientio :: Summary of Arguments against the Experientio :: The Forensic Inference within the Experientio :: EXPERIENTIO PART ONE
In a message dated 2/24/2008 11:35:50 AM Eastern Standard Time,
jPolanik at nc.rr.com writes:
Heidegger opens BaT (section 9) with “We are ourselves the entities to
be analysed”. if I translate this into the first person, I get something
like “I am this entity I will analyze’ or “I am *this* which I will
analyze”. so I know that I am; but, not yet what I am.
so, how do I determine that I am a dasein instead of a mind, or spirit
or soul or a group of neurons or a quantum phenomenon?
Joe
Good question, more so that self-analysis is impossible
and can only lead to the tautological redundance that comes with dasein. The
‘what’ because ‘other’ is thus obfuscated.
Bernard
**************Ideas to please picky eaters. Watch video on AOL Living.
http://living.aol.com/video/how-to-pleas…
2050827?NCID=aolcmp00300000002598)