The Stated But Unproven Case for Trannie-Religio Reificae
October 5th, 2008, search relatedRelated posts :: My Dissertation - Correction :: My Dissertation - Correction :: Trannie *Logic* :: Trannie *Logic*
In a message dated 01/10/2008 _jPolanik at nc.rr.com_
(mailto:jPolanik@nc.rr.com) writes:
The Stated But Unproven Case for Trannie-Religio Reificae.
Jud: (formerly)
Acknowledging the fact that subject- predicate sentences are not able to get
along without a indicant copula of course reinforces my claim that *BE* and
its conjugates/ is, am, was were/ etc., NEVER EVER address /pure existence/
bereft of any existential modality, despite of hundreds of years of abusive
effort on behalf of the priestly and transcendental community to try and fit a
square non-ontological semantic peg into a round ontological hole.
Joe:
The resources of a language adequate to express philosophical theorizing
must be broader than the reality philosophers theorize about. why, you ask? for
one simple reason: the ignorance of philosophers — using ignorance in the
Socratic sense where awareness of ignorance is the beginning of philosophy (for
those who are motivated to philosophise by their awareness of their own
ignorance).
Jud:
Nothing can be broader or more sensible than that which is there, being the
material objects with which we are surrounded …
Joe:
all that is, is.
if you say ‘all that is, is matergy’, you are making a stronger knowledge
claim; so, you should state your case for this additional knowledge.
it is not enough to say that there is matergy. you would have to show that
there is *only* matergy. state your case *for* the proposition that ‘all that
is, is only matergy’ if you could also prove your case, you would certainly be
nominated for a Nobel prize (assuming you worked in a field for which a
Nobel can be awarded).
Jud:
Actually I was more interested in receiving the vital message from you which
deals with my recent demolition of the *I think therefore I am.* absurdity.
I am curious to see the form of apologetics of how you handle it. With
regard to your insistence that:
it is * not enough to say that there is matergy. you would have to show
that there is *only* matergy*
Your spurious and completely illogical argument is as old as the hills. I
(and folk like me) have absolutely no obligation at all to prove *that there
is *only* matergy,* which in effect entails first proving the existence of
matergy such as the Statue of Liberty, The Eiffel Tower and other physical
objects, and then moving on to proving that there is no truth in your hotly
defended insistence that you are constantly surrounded by ghostly metaphysical
invisibles, which like Heideggerian harpies, pluck and tear at your garments,
and throw objects around your study, and that some of them (of the more evil
variety) plan, control and play with the destiny of humankind. Is it the
responsibility of the sane to prove the non-existence of the invisible
reificative regalia of * Being* and Dasein* and other such Nazi metaphysical
memorabilia, which are considered pseudo-objects of desire by the devoted,
sycophantic Heideggerian collectors of such passe attic rubbish?
That which we claim exists is there for all to see, taste, feel, hear and
smell. Hit yourself on the head with a hammer if you don’t believe me. It is YOU
that claim there are additional invisible and sensorially undetectable
entities - and therefore the onus is upon you to prove it. Why for example should
the churches of most western countries be granted immunity from paying taxes
(some say the Catholic church is the richest organisation in the world) based
purely upon their claim that there are such things as God, angels Seraphim
when in fact there are only bricks, mortar, pews, and pederast priests?
Is it not unfair that atheists who deny the actuality of these ghosts be
also allowed to live tax-free? Yes? No? Don’t know?
Even to attempt to comprehend of deny the actuality of the phantoms that
emerge out of the neurological turmoil that is going on behind the closed
eyelids of transcendentalists would open the sluice-gates that hold back an
illogical tidal wave of absurdity which would burst through the defences of reason
in a tsunami of turdery which would surge over the surface of the earth and
render the whole of human progress submerged in a similar state of dark
unknowingness which hitherto has only been experienced by the Trannie captain and
crew of HMS Noah’s Arc as the post-deluge survivors paddled to the top of
Mount Sinai and surveyed the flooded earth below.
The denier of unreason and childish ignorance would not just be faced with
an occasional wandering albatross of doom in the manner of The Ancient
Mariner, but with a bobbing ocean of surf borne ghosts, spectres, spooks, souls,
green cheese, alien visitors, astrological prediction, poltergeists,
revenants, psyches, shadows, shades, wraiths, egos, ids, minds, fates, mentalisms,
ideas, memes, qualia, feelings, pain, movements, gods, deities, idols, supreme
beings, A’as, God of wisdom Babylon/Hittite/Hurrian A’ra, Local god Arabic
A-a, Goddess of the sun Babylon/Mesopotamia/Akkadia/Semitic Aa Maakhuer, Lion
god of truthful speech Egypt Aabit, Goddess of song Egypt Aaghu Gugu, Goddess
of the of the dawn Cherokee Aah, God of the moon of Memphis. Egypt Aahmes
Nefertari, Protector/punisher of humans elevated to goddesshood Egypt
Aakuluujjusi, Creator mother Inuit Aasith, Goddess of the hunt, war, and the desert
Egypt/Syria Aataentsic, Goddess Iroquois Aatxe, Evil spirit capable of assuming
human form Basque Ab Kin Xoc, God of war Mayan Aba khatun Baikal, Goddess of
the sea Siberia Abaangui, God whose huge nose became the moon Guarani Abaasy,
Netherworld beings Yakut Abaddon, Chief of the demons of the 7th hierarchy
Hebrew/Christian Abandinus, God known only by inscription Roman/Celtic/British
Abarta, God of the Tuatha De Danann Ireland Abassi, Creator of the world Efik
Abat[t]ur, It weighs souls and/or their deeds Mandaean Abeguwo, Rain goddess
Melanesia/New Guinea Abellio See Abello Abello, God of apple trees Gaul
Abeona, Guardian goddess of children leaving home to go on their own Roman Abere,
Goddess of evil Melanesia Abgal, Desert and tutelary god of the Bedouins
Arabic Abgal, Seven spirits who derived from the the Abzu Sumeria Abhijit,
Benevolent astral deity and goddess of fortune Hindu/Puranic Abhijnaraja,
Physician Aesir, and hrimnir the cook of the aesir. Angrboda goddess and wife of loki
astrild goddess of love. Atla water goddess. Audhumla the primeval cow,
formed from the melting ice. Balder fairest of the gods beyla the servant of
freyr. Borghild goddess of the evening mist or moon, she slays the sun each
evening. Bragi god of poets and the patron of all skaldi (poets) in norse culture.
Brono the son of balder. He is the god of daylight. Bylgia water goddess.
Dagur the personification of day, he drives the day chariot across the sky.
Disen a group of goddess in old norse mythology. Called the “dis of the vanir”.
Eir goddess of healing and shamanic healers, companion of the goddess frigg
elli goddess of old age. Fenrir also known as fenris. The great wolf, child of
loki and angrboda forseti god of justice who settles court disputes in his
gilded hall. Freya goddess of love, beauty and sensuality. Freyr god of
fertility, sun and rain. Frigg wife of odin and the goddess of marriage and
fertility. Gefion goddess of agriculture and the plough. Gerd the wife of freyr and
a goddess of fertility. She is the personification of the fertile soil.
Heimdall god of light and protection. Hel the goddess of death and ruler of the
realm of the dead. Hermod the messenger of the gods. Often equated to the greek
god hermes. Hod blind god of darkness and winter. Holler god of disease and
destruction. Idun goddess of the spring, eternal youth and the keeper of the
golden apples jord goddess of the primitive and unpopulated earth. Jormungand
the midgard serpent kari leader of the storm giants. Kvasir the wisest of
the vanir gods. Laga goddess of wells and springs. Lofn goddess of forbidden
love, who blesses all illicit love affairs. Loki trickster god of the norse,
concerned with thievery, magic and fire. Magni son of thor and god of brute
strength. Mani god of the moon and brother of the sun goddess sol. Miming minor
forest god. Mimir wisest god of the aesir, sent in a hostage trade to the
rival vanir gods. Modi god of battle wrath, he was the leader of the berserkers.
Njord god of the sea, wind and fire. He bestows good fortune to those on the
sea. Norns the triple goddesses of fate and destiny. Nott goddess of night
who mans the night-charion in it’s track through the sky. Odin the chief god
of the aesir and most important of the norse deities. Ran goddess of storms
and the drowned dead. Saga goddess of poetry and history. Sif wife of thor, and
possibly an ancient fertility goddess. Sjofn goddess of love, passion and
marital harmony. Skadi a frost giant and goddess of winter. Sleipnir the
eight-legged horse of odin sol goddess of the sun, who guides the sun-chariot
through the sky. Syn goddess of watchfulness and truth. Thor thunder-god and the
protector of men and gods. Tyr the original god of war in the germanic culture
ull god of justice and duelling, archery and skiing. Vali son of odin, and
the god born to avenge the death of balder. Valkyries the battle-maidens, who
choose the best warriors vanir a group of fertility and nature gods Var
goddess of contracts and marriage agreements Vida and so on… and so on… and so
on…glug, glug, glug.
It is the responsibility of the transcendentalist claimant or
proselytisering petitioner (in this case YOU) to bring forth copious hard evidence before
your non-transcendentalist peers that these curious phantoms are more than
merely denotational dead-end pathways in the brains of the ontologically
challenged, which you (for some unknown reason) yo deem it necessary to project into
the world by proselytizing such imagingsas having an authentic, existing
soul-like denotata hovering, floating - or in someway being umbilically attached
by skeins of ectoplasmic silk to the physical objects upon which they
instantiationally and parasistically feed.
It is the responsibility of the claimant YOU to bring forth hard evidence
before your non-transcendentalist peers that this curious phantoms are more than
merely denotational dead-end pathways in your brain which you (for some
unknown reason) deem it necessary to project into the world b y proselytize as
having an authentic, existing soul-like denotata hovering, floating or in
someway attached to the physical objects upon which they instantiationally and
parasistically depend
Jud