<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: THE STUPIDITY OF CREATIO EX NIHILO.</title>
	<link>http://heidegger.an-archos.com/archive/the-stupidity-of-creatio-ex-nihilo-3</link>
	<description>Philosophical Discussions</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 12:14:54 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: bagher</title>
		<link>http://heidegger.an-archos.com/archive/the-stupidity-of-creatio-ex-nihilo-3#comment-7383</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 19:56:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://heidegger.an-archos.com/archive/the-stupidity-of-creatio-ex-nihilo-3#comment-7383</guid>
					<description>HI
I MUST  MAB  T.V   MODEL  VX-T2170PH</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HI<br />
I MUST  MAB  T.V   MODEL  VX-T2170PH
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: blu</title>
		<link>http://heidegger.an-archos.com/archive/the-stupidity-of-creatio-ex-nihilo-3#comment-7078</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2007 04:39:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://heidegger.an-archos.com/archive/the-stupidity-of-creatio-ex-nihilo-3#comment-7078</guid>
					<description>re: creation out of nothing and the big bang theory
i seem to recall reading somewhere that in a perfect vacuum virtual particles can exist, changing the energy levels at a minute level for the smallest amount of time.
doesn't that insinuate that creation of something out of nothing is possible?
i'm not being pro-creatio ex nihilo, i'm just saying that it is possible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>re: creation out of nothing and the big bang theory<br />
i seem to recall reading somewhere that in a perfect vacuum virtual particles can exist, changing the energy levels at a minute level for the smallest amount of time.<br />
doesn&#8217;t that insinuate that creation of something out of nothing is possible?<br />
i&#8217;m not being pro-creatio ex nihilo, i&#8217;m just saying that it is possible.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Brian Hook</title>
		<link>http://heidegger.an-archos.com/archive/the-stupidity-of-creatio-ex-nihilo-3#comment-7021</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2007 02:49:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://heidegger.an-archos.com/archive/the-stupidity-of-creatio-ex-nihilo-3#comment-7021</guid>
					<description>To say that the Big Bang made stuff out of nothing leaves a big question unasnwered - that is - where did the stuff come from.  Many people try to say that God made the big bang and thet is where the nothing came from.  But, this doesn't read right with Genesis chapt. 1.  Gen 1 talks about hte goodness of the creation, and the big bang leaves too much time, and too much ungood to reconcile with the Bible.  Simple seven days of 24 hours and good speaking creation into existance, and so it is from nothing.  God is not part of creation any more than a person is part of the item which he/she has made.  I am a builder, but the house is not part of me, nor I part of it. The difference is that I need something to build from.  God does not.  Something from nothing, and it wiil not be done again, as far as we know from what God tells us in the Bible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To say that the Big Bang made stuff out of nothing leaves a big question unasnwered - that is - where did the stuff come from.  Many people try to say that God made the big bang and thet is where the nothing came from.  But, this doesn&#8217;t read right with Genesis chapt. 1.  Gen 1 talks about hte goodness of the creation, and the big bang leaves too much time, and too much ungood to reconcile with the Bible.  Simple seven days of 24 hours and good speaking creation into existance, and so it is from nothing.  God is not part of creation any more than a person is part of the item which he/she has made.  I am a builder, but the house is not part of me, nor I part of it. The difference is that I need something to build from.  God does not.  Something from nothing, and it wiil not be done again, as far as we know from what God tells us in the Bible.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: walskip</title>
		<link>http://heidegger.an-archos.com/archive/the-stupidity-of-creatio-ex-nihilo-3#comment-6669</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 07:34:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://heidegger.an-archos.com/archive/the-stupidity-of-creatio-ex-nihilo-3#comment-6669</guid>
					<description>Perhaps God IS Nature-The Living One- or even the Collective unconscious of Carl G. Jung, or at least that part of it that is becoming conscious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps God IS Nature-The Living One- or even the Collective unconscious of Carl G. Jung, or at least that part of it that is becoming conscious.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Rev. Peter Adeyemi</title>
		<link>http://heidegger.an-archos.com/archive/the-stupidity-of-creatio-ex-nihilo-3#comment-1123</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2006 16:43:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://heidegger.an-archos.com/archive/the-stupidity-of-creatio-ex-nihilo-3#comment-1123</guid>
					<description>I agree with your idea that Genesis account of creation does not imply creatio ex nihilo in the real sense of the word. However the verb bara used in the opening sentence of Genesis refers to nothing.There was nothing inthe beginning when God created heaven and earth. I dis agree with you that God created the universe out of the substance of himself.That assertion would  make the universe and all it contains eternal.In away analogous to describing it as being the same with God.This is simple pantheism that does not square with our understanding of creatio ex nihilo in theology.It is not scintific either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with your idea that Genesis account of creation does not imply creatio ex nihilo in the real sense of the word. However the verb bara used in the opening sentence of Genesis refers to nothing.There was nothing inthe beginning when God created heaven and earth. I dis agree with you that God created the universe out of the substance of himself.That assertion would  make the universe and all it contains eternal.In away analogous to describing it as being the same with God.This is simple pantheism that does not square with our understanding of creatio ex nihilo in theology.It is not scintific either.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
