What am I? What is a Human?
November 30th, 2008, search relatedRelated posts :: What is the Structure of a Human Individual? :: Implicit Copula Complement :: What am I? What is a Human? :: Implicit Copula Complement
[Joe]: however, in any inquiry into the structure of the human
individual, it is woefully inadequate because it has not yet been
established that the human is or is not more than just a human body.
[Richard]: Joe, the above statement startled me! Please tell me what
you imagine to be any experiment that would put this thesis to rest –
i.e. that the question is open as to humans being more than humans,
since a human body [assumed to be living] IS a human.
[Joe]: it seems that you believe that a human individual is no more
than a living human body. is that belief an assumption you have made or
a conclusion you have drawn? if the latter; then, would you describe
the basis for your conclusion — what is the evidence and/or the
argument that you found persuasive?
[Jud]: You reply with the oldest, laughable trick in the trannie book.
Answer Richard’s question you Artful Dodger! YOU are the one who makes
the bizarre ontological claims about: *mind* and *souls* and other
existential infantilisms. It is not Richard’s place to prove that the
elements with which you populate your fantasy Mickey Mouse world do not
exist.
[Joe (new)]: I am not making a meta-phenomenal claim. I am making the
epistemological point that neither the claim that there are souls nor
that claim that there are no souls has been proven. if you feel that
one of these claims has in fact been proven; kindly state the case that
you found persuasive.
Joe
–
Philosophy is, after all, done ultimately in the first person for the
first person. — H-N Castaneda
@^@~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~@^@
http://what-am-i.net
@^@~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~@^@
