Heidegger

On 07/08/2006, at 5:23 AM, Bob Guevara wrote:
> I took the time to checkout the urls that Malcolm provides and it
> is now more clear than ever that there is nothing but dug-in
> political heels here.
Hi Bob,
care to elucidate on that? Which of the three links display dug in
political heels for you?
The Yesha Rabbinical […]

On 12/06/2006, at 8:52 PM, Anthony Crifasi wrote:
> Present moral accusations undercover of neutral philosophical
> discussion by exclusively giving ideologically one-sided examples.
You are “disappearing up your own arse, mate” as we Aussies say. I
take it then that yes, you are incapable of dealing honestly and
openly with historical problems that threaten your sanitized view of
history […]

On 10/06/2006, at 11:22 PM, That Pete wrote:
> This occurred to me last night. The affinity with the “WWII was a
> Roosevelt conspiracy” theme popular with some. The struck me was
> the parallel threads of: Arabs and Japanese aren’t clever enough to
> pull off such attacks.
I’m not one for popular conspiracy myths That Pete, […]

Preliminary Draft of the Principles of a Universal Proscription
Or a code of practice for the self-reflexivity of modern polemos
1. Denigrate and dismiss
a. Denigrate opponent
b. Denigrate opponents claims
2. Dismiss the old guard
3. Politicization of science
4. Reject scientific authority
5. Anti-intellectualism
6. Claim intellectual superiority
7. Enemy succour
8. Radicalize opposition
9. War crimes are liberation from tyranny
10. Dismiss government criminality
11. […]

On 09/06/2006, at 9:44 PM, That Pete wrote:
> — Dr Malcolm Riddoch wrote:
>> Are you asking for a proof from Steven E Jones essay that shows ‘Bush
>> did it’?
>
> You’re changing the rules. From merely having to show that
> Malcolm believes in a flat earth style hypothesis, you’re
> moving the goal posts to […]

On 08/06/2006, at 5:03 AM, That Pete wrote:
> — Malcolm Riddoch wrote:
>> and also the essays of BYU Physics Professor Steven E. Jones:
>>
>> http://www.physics.byu.edu/research/ener…
>
> I read this. He’s a physicist who has done research in cold fusion
> and also claims Jesus visited America. The structural engineers
> at his own university dispute his analysis.
Good start […]

On 07/06/2006, at 9:05 PM, Anthony Crifasi wrote:
> Your silly little proscription speaks for someone trying to misportray
> anti-anti-Americanism as merely dismissive by ripping accusations
> from the
> specific contexts in which they were originally applied, which is
> your usual
> m.o., and therefore hardly surprising.
Okay so how about we universalize them then? This draft list […]

On 06/06/2006, at 2:02 AM, That Pete wrote:
> Hey, thanks for all the sarcastic chuckles.
>
> My intial point, before the departure into silliness, was
> that if you have a substantive point to make in the
> Heidegger department, not drowning it in anti-americanism
> would help me to discern it.
I’ll add this as:
12. Befriend and distract
You […]

On 04/06/2006, at 11:52 AM, That Pete wrote:
>> In regards to this question then what about American anti-American
>> speech?
>
> I think it is fine for Americans to burn their own flag, as a symbol
> of some aspect of America they don’t like. I don’t think that’s
> anti-americanism.
>
> On the other hand I’ve never seen […]