Heidegger

On 10/06/2006, at 1:43 AM, That Pete wrote:
> Is it
> just this physicist’s credentials (he sez so) that make you believe
> the wtc was demolished, or is there a specific bit of evidence that
> makes you believe the wtc towers were demolished?
Neither. The physicist’s credentials lend me to take his questions
seriously, and there are […]

On 08/06/2006, at 7:04 AM, That Pete wrote:
> So it is all those taken together that convinces you that Bush blew
> up three WTC buildings? So if one is proven false, your whole
> conspiracy implodes? Or is there one item that by itself proves that
> Bush did it definitively?
Are you asking for a proof […]

On 08/06/2006, at 3:31 AM, That Pete wrote:
> I’m game. Multitudes watched the planes hits the towers and the towers
> collapse. There’s the footage that millions watched live on TV. The
> physics makes sense. What leads you to believe the towers were brought
> down by a controlled demolition?
The physics don’t even vaguely make sense, […]