Heidegger

On 07/06/2006, at 9:05 PM, Anthony Crifasi wrote:
> Your silly little proscription speaks for someone trying to misportray
> anti-anti-Americanism as merely dismissive by ripping accusations
> from the
> specific contexts in which they were originally applied, which is
> your usual
> m.o., and therefore hardly surprising.
Okay so how about we universalize them then? This draft list […]

— michaelP wrote:
> > Heidegger appears to feel that terror is something that must be dealt
> > with; i.e. avoiding it would be inauthentic.
> >
> > “So the man that truly knows is not the one who blindly runs
> > after a truth but only the one who constantly knows all three
> > […]

On 03/06/2006, at 9:21 PM, michaelP wrote:
> hi malcom, before going any further let me add that I did say (wrt
> to prior thinking terror) we ought to discuss what terror is
> “without merely and only” providing illustrative examples (around
> which, it seems, there is initial disagreement and disjunction
> {e.g., whether the USA is […]

On 03/06/2006, at 6:10 PM, michaelP wrote:
Malcom asks:
> If anyone else on list or on the site would care to discuss the problem
of
> “terror”, pro or contra, please feel free to join in.
Malcom, the question of terrors and terrorisms (and of related errors and
errorisms) where we of necessity begin thinking these in the very middle […]