Heidegger

On 10/06/2006, at 11:22 PM, That Pete wrote:
> This occurred to me last night. The affinity with the “WWII was a
> Roosevelt conspiracy” theme popular with some. The struck me was
> the parallel threads of: Arabs and Japanese aren’t clever enough to
> pull off such attacks.
I’m not one for popular conspiracy myths That Pete, […]

Preliminary Draft of the Principles of a Universal Proscription
Or a code of practice for the self-reflexivity of modern polemos
1. Denigrate and dismiss
a. Denigrate opponent
b. Denigrate opponents claims
2. Dismiss the old guard
3. Politicization of science
4. Reject scientific authority
5. Anti-intellectualism
6. Claim intellectual superiority
7. Enemy succour
8. Radicalize opposition
9. War crimes are liberation from tyranny
10. Dismiss government criminality
11. […]

On 07/06/2006, at 9:05 PM, Anthony Crifasi wrote:
> Your silly little proscription speaks for someone trying to misportray
> anti-anti-Americanism as merely dismissive by ripping accusations
> from the
> specific contexts in which they were originally applied, which is
> your usual
> m.o., and therefore hardly surprising.
Okay so how about we universalize them then? This draft list […]

On 03/06/2006, at 10:16 PM, Anthony Crifasi wrote:
> A history of Malcolm’s “neutral” stating of questions can be found
> here:
>
> http://www.soca.ecu.edu.au/pipermail/hei…
Heh, yes I very much enjoyed that particular thread Anthony, it was
actually fun thanks largely to your contribution. I look forward to
the next one, and for those interested in reading through the archive
my initial contribution […]

—– Original Message —–
From: “Malcolm Riddoch”
> On 03/06/2006, at 3:23 PM, Anthony Crifasi wrote:
>
>> My prediction for Malcolm’s next reply: “And the point is … what
>> exactly?”
>
> As I stated prevously, you are welcome to join in the discussion
> anytime you feel up to it. The thread starts here:
>
> http://heidegger.an-archos.com/archive/e…
>
> Cheney’s reasoning for oil […]